Energy/perseverance/drive and other harder to measure factors. I have no family history of autism. As far as I can tell, the explosion in diagnoses is primarily driven not by the very low-functioning (everyone could already tell that non-verbal folks had something wrong with them) but by increased diagnosis of medium-to-high-functioning people. Their intelligence tends to be more imbalanced than neurotypicals, so IQ tests (which rely on an assumption that most forms of intelligence are correlated) are less applicable. This is common-sensically true and matches previous research into all of these factors. My 3rd child, a girl, is much lower functioning. Maybe one bias from my statement is Im young, and many of my smart friends are also young. Only 3% of autistic people were found to have IQs above 115, even though 15% of the population should be at this level. This could also tie back in to socioeconomic status better off parents may be more likely to have kids diagnosed as having autism instead of some other less acceptable mental disability, which could also potentially explain the racial disparities. Lets say for example that parameter A is the learning rate in the part of the brain that deals with reasoning. I am one of those people who has to run emulators to appear socially normal. Genes encode changes to these hyperparameters. If genes for autism (without autism itself) increase intelligence, we should expect these people to be unusually smart. (Note that if autism is really one thing [not a complex syndrome], with high and normal functioning individuals, and high vs normal correlates with IQ, then if you only measure the normal autistics, youd get results like the above, due to sampling bias. Get the latest business insights from Dun & Bradstreet. More generally, to relate to those people around you who are also bright. But the ability to notice patterns in the world, analyze phenomena and their causes/effects, understand highly complex and abstract concepts, and make connections between things all seem to be correlated with higher levels of social awareness and persuasive ability. There is no reason to think that e.g. Umm, what? Its not about purely not working out, although I would say natural strength is a part of it (almost every wrestler can increase his in-match power through lifting still), its about the muscles being coordinated and firing at the right angles and right times to actually accomplish something. That seems like a poor methodology; I think it would be better to start with an unbiased sample of the general population and test them for both autism and IQ. Smart people who can manage things by themselves and mask the effects of their autism from others dont get diagnosed, because among other things they dont want to see a psychiatrist and can figure out how to stop people from forcing them to; they can also know the correct answer to psychiatric interviews and can figure out that the things currently bothering them are less likely to continue if they provide the correct answers. She hoped to use this theory to explore why some autistics show delayed language acquisition. (2005) reported that 50% of families visited their adult with autism at least weekly and an equal number of adults came weekly to visit at their mother's home. The entire idea of a gene for intelligence is just as silly as a gene for running fast. There are genes which have lower-order effects, and intelligence or running are higher-order capabilities that emerge from the lower-order system in complex ways (indeed, theres probably several more layers than that.) But the basic eugenics of moving intelligence higher at the margin through differential fertility, or the soon-to-be possible embryo selection for intelligence, this is not an argument against that. To the best of my knowledge, the whole Idiocracy concept (humans are selecting against intelligence because smart people have fewer children) is basically nothing more than a just-so story made up by concerned pseudo-intellectuals. A link between Tay-Sachs gene and intelligence. Observing matters in my local school, I think that child psychiatry is best understood as a means of managing problems that arise in childrens socialization to the school environment, and clusters of diagnoses align with a big three of socialization difficulties: weird dont fit in kids are diagnosed as autistic, restless cant sit still or stop acting up kids are diagnosed as ADD, violent/fighting/tantrum kids are diagnosed with oppositional disorders. (2) Genes associated with autism arent being selected for Theres a question if you want to go really far out, outside the modern human range, and you might get unforeseen side effects. This is not the whole story, and even cases of autism that are caused entirely or mostly by normal genetics are associated with unusually low IQ (80% confidence), 5. However being homozygous for this new mutation would lead to a person being red-green colorblind. surveyed ~4000 MENSA members and found that in addition to being at a signficant increase in risk not just in ASDs and mood disorders but also in food allergies, asthma and 2x RR of autoimmune conditions compared to the general population. In some sense, all autism has such-and-such characteristics studies are studying the way people like to define autism, and tell us nothing about any underlying disease process. Under https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/05/07/5-httlpr-a-pointed-review/ Murphy wrote: disorders like huntingtons where its theorized that theres a tradeoff between risk of death and IQ. And her failure to understand social cues lets her be taken advantage of by lower-quality men, who have sexually abused her on multiple occasions. I talk more about this in parts 2 and 3 here. However, once it exceeds a certain threshold, the network starts learning things that dont make any sense, and then when it tries to correct those mistakes it goes too far in the other direction again. High IQ, excellent at math, maybe a little socially awkward but not too bad (we live in a reasonably large town, so there are lots of like-minded kids he can socialize with.) Everyone else, enslaved or not, kept dying off working the fields. and they seem just as likely to have unplanned children as less intelligent people with equally bad impulse control. Is it kind of like a bimodal distribution, i.e. Couldnt this all be the result of several essentailly different things being lumped together under the label autism spectrum? I view it as absolutely crucial that bright kids get to socialize with kids like them, and also that someone teaches them how to be a functional person. Doing some [fundamental] discovery is harder and harder. These different enrichment profiles observed provide evidence for a heterogeneous and qualitatively different genetic architecture between sub-types of ASD, which should inform future studies aiming at identifying etiologies and disease mechanisms in ASD. Its not like theyll answer anybody. Increased parental age correlates with autism risk, AIUI. He (I presume) seems to be a bad conversationalist, likely through lack of practice. While their children are clearly at higher risk for autistic traits, I think they want to know whether they have higher risk for the most severe forms of the syndrome, including intellectual disability and poor functioning. Under the DSM-5, autism is characterized by persistent deficits in social communication and interaction across multiple contexts, as well as restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities. Suppose the only study on age-related mortality shows that people older than 30 are 1.2x more likely to die in a given year than people younger than 30, but does not give any other information. The best civil servants get an extra allowance of weirdness points to allocate as necessary. ASD has no reliable early predictor, no unitary developmental course, no unitary life outcome, no unitary recurrence risk, no unitary pattern of BAP features, and no standard homogeneous subgroups. Every autism case is caused by some combination of these three factors, and the more it is caused by normal genes, the more intelligence is likely to be preserved (~100% confidence), 4. She is a university qualified computer systems engineer. Anecdote is not data, which overwhelmingly show a negative correlation between IQ and fertility. Score: They also have higher rates of having children with multiple partners. My first thought when hearing that autism intelligence data is that people are much more likely to end up with the autistic label if theyre disabled. And many types of successful arrangements/balances existbrilliant minds can look very different, and a trait or dynamic good in one person can take another person down if the overall arrangement is out of whackactually, the same trait can lead to wildly different outcomes in the same person. Still, the IQ-boosting alleles produce autism instead of a more classical low IQ that genetic load alone would have had. Seems like it could apply if there were many genes of small but overlapping effect, so that one particular aspect of mental performance is sometimes pushed past the breaking point. On the first level its obviously because of the genetic abnormalities they have, but its not like we could look at those gene differences and predict that those features would develop in that way. Some people worry about assortative mating in Silicon Valley: highly analytical tech workers marry other highly analytical tech workers. I notice a lot of people confuse normality with charisma. I am simply saying that when you encounter lots of GS11+ people they are exactly like Comey. Or rather, that the concept of Asperger autism is more related to giftedness, and not to autism. They would more easily get high IQ amongst Aspies, whom I dont consider Autistic. Girls also get autism, but seem to stay undiagnosed much more often. She has absolute pitch, [] an amazingly high proportion of her autistic students have it to some degree. My vague mental model is that there are a bunch of different parameters that have to be within a certain range to get good performance from your brain. Big muscles can also reduce range of motion. Theres one other possible source of systematic bias in the data: living and available parents, especially fathers. Autism, rationality and intelligence. Of the autistics I personally know (through common support groups), the Aspergers all have a parent who is an engineer or computer scientist of some sort. If the mums with low functioning autistic children, the ones I spoke to described the fathers as losers or deadbeats. But by intelligence mean the ability of a complex system (a brain) to operate effectively; so being smart is much more similar to being able to run really fast or having a good immune system.. However, I wouldnt be surprised if a statistically high proportion of people here are autistic or have autistic family members. So for example, bench is largely worthless if youre not pushing people away from you. Her condition presents with some speech and language processing difficulties. There are a lot more pathways to leveraging raw intelligence to acquire economic status now than there used to be, but very few that get you all the way to the point that youre fully safe from the tribe (since the tribe is now the nation and is thus also much stronger now). Gender dysphoria. I dont think 99% would stand out here, but I dont think itd quite be mediocre either. Each genes benefit is based on underlying assumptions about how the body works, and if you change enough of those assumptions, the entire edifice becomes a failure. The other two options I guess take effort, but Id say its effort that they enjoy putting in, because they enjoy the rewards (friendship, novel socializing, etc.). (This sounds harsh, but I want a child at least as normal as I am). I wonder what the genetics for this would look like. To some extent, incompatible advantages can stack by affecting entirely different things (one runner with salutary mutations affecting his legs, his lungs, and his adrenal gland) But to some extent they cant. Too much difference from wild type synaptic pruning and youve got pathology in addition to the possible, but not certain, optimization. Its hard to pin down why this is the case, but I think it is related to the things above, but also to the fact that gifted people tend to be bad at copying other people instinctively. If we take the Ronemus and Gardner studies seriously, the answer seems to be yes.
Does Aldi Take P Ebt,
Medstar Epaystub Login,
Steelix Nicknames,
Articles S