Learn more about animal testing alternatives. Human wellness is more likely to be advanced by devoting resources to the development of non-animal test methods, which have the potential to be cheaper, faster, and more relevant to our bodies and health. One of the main advantages for animal testing is advancements in medical research. Tracey Woodruff, a professor at the University of California, San Franciscos school of medicine, said current alternatives to animal testing are somewhat useful. Banning animal testing would save lives. Animals and Ethics 101 - Thinking Critically About Animal Rights (Nobis), { "8.01:_Readings" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.02:_Criticisms_or_Complaints_about_(Some)_Activists_Have_No_Implications_for_the_Morality_of_Animal_Use" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.03:_Ends_and_Means" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.04:_Animal_Advocates_Promoting_Animal_Use" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.05:_Illegal_Actions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.06:_Violent_Actions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.07:_Discussion_Questions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.08:_Recommended_Further_Reading-" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.09:_Abortion_and_Animal_Rights-_Does_Either_Topic_Lead_to_the_Other" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.10:_Animal_Testing_Should_Be_Banned" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Introduction_to_Ethics_Logic_and_Ethics_and_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_What_Are_(Some)_Animals_Like_Animal_Minds_and_Harms_to_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_In_Defense_of_Animals-_Some_Moral_Arguments" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_Objections_to_Defenses_of_Animals_and_Defending_Animal_Use" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Wearing_and_Eating_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Experimenting_on_Animals_Animals_in_Education" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Pets___Companion_Animals_Zoos_Hunting_Racing_and_other_Uses_of_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Activism_for_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, [ "article:topic", "license:ccbysa", "showtoc:no", "authorname:nnobis", "licenseversion:40", "source@https://animalethics101.blogspot.com/p/nathan-nobis.html" ], https://human.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fhuman.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FPhilosophy%2FAnimals_and_Ethics_101_-_Thinking_Critically_About_Animal_Rights_(Nobis)%2F08%253A_Activism_for_Animals%2F8.10%253A_Animal_Testing_Should_Be_Banned, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\). Many animals, especially primates, share about 90% of their genetic make-ups with humans, so experimenting on such animals can give scientists a good idea about possible reactions in the human body. However, we might be able to use our current research findings in order to apply them to potential diseases in the future. In my opinion, animal testing should not be banned because using animals for experiments is cheaper and there is no way to simulate human pregnancy. Since the majority of animal tests will not deliver any useful results for the application of medicines or vaccines on humans, it can also be considered to be quite an inefficient research technique. It would be wrong to test a drug of unknown effect on humans, which is why we test on animals first. We are really excited as this has been something weve wanted for quite some time, said Kitty Block, the president and chief executive of the Humane Society of the United States, an animal protection organization. Best Omega-3 Supplement for Joint Pain: Clinical Effects Omega Daily. Every year in the U.S., tens of millions animals suffer and die in chemical, drug, food, and product tests. While much scientific research cannot be adequately done without animals, commercial safety testing, such as by cosmetics companies, is increasingly being done without the use of animals. Thus, from an ethical perspective, animal testing can be considered to be rather questionable and there are also many activists who claim that we should completely abandon animal research on a global scale due to that. Many go insane, rocking back and forth, pacing endlessly inside cages, and doing repetitive motions such as back-flipping. The Act leaves out over 25 million animals at risk of abuse and neglect yearly. Although animal tests can provide us with a rough estimation regarding how certain medicines will affect human physiology, they might not be suitable to provide us with sufficient knowledge regarding the long-term effects of those drugs. A decade of studies shows that most animal experimentation never leads to benefits for humans. Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned: Key Cons Inhumane Treatment in Animal Experimentation Any conversation about animal analysis's pros and cons ought to admit that creature research topics involve subjecting animals to what could aptly be called torture. Chimpanzees and humans share 99 percent of their DNA, and even mice and humans have a 98 percent overlap in this area. 8.9: Abortion and Animal Rights- Does Either Topic Lead to the Other? . Testing potentially includes the jabbing of needles, storage into cramped spaces, and lack of quality/quantity in nutrition. On Sept. 10, the Environmental Protection Agency said it would move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals, a decision that was hailed by animal rights groups but criticized by environmentalists and researchers who said the practice was necessary to rigorously safeguard human health. Students, read the entire article, then tell us: Do you support the decision by the E.P.A. Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. In the past, there had been many diseases that led to the death of millions of people which can be treated much better today and some of those diseases had even ben eradicated over time. Animal treatments that were developed using animal testing also include remedies for glaucoma and hip dysplasia, as well as pacemakers for heart disease. This is a cost that may reoccur over the course of several months, even years. One significant problem of animal research is that there are many ethical concerns related to it. Our research has shown that using dogs, rats, mice and rabbits to test whether or not a drug will be safe for humans provides statistically little useful insight. Animal experimentation has clear and undeniable benefits to humankind; for example, the development of drugs to combat deadly diseases. Thus, it is crucial that this kind of research is carried out with great care in order to avoid those unpleasant surprises. As an associate, I may earn commissions from qualifying purchases from Amazon or other programs. Some people may argue that animal testing is cruel and inhumane, but it is actually a very humane process. He is pursuing a medical degree. Human beings live an estimated 70 years. If you are looking for more ways to live an eco-conscious lifestyles, then check out our complete guide here. Our study also revealed that drug tests on monkeys are just as poor as those using any other species in predicting the effects on humans. There are many opinions about the pros and cons of using animals in scientific research. Scientific American: The Benets and Ethics of Animal Research, Understanding Animal Research: Nine Out of Ten Statistics Are Taken Out of Context. The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) protects a small section of animals, such as dogs and cats. These sentient beings arent even defined as animals under this act, which is the only federal law offering any sort of protection for animals. Animal testing taken here to mean the use of animals in research for the purpose of furthering human concerns such as drug efficacy and the safety of products such as cosmetics is an endeavor fraught with controversy and difficult ethical arguments. Find all our Student Opinion questions here. What is animal testing? In fact, many medicines that have been successfully tested on animals have failed to deliver proper results for humans. Without Consent: A Century of Animal Experiments. Only with this kind of medical progress, we had been able to cure serious diseases in the past and will also be able to do so in the future. 89% of scientists surveyed by the Pew Research Center were in favor of animal testing for scientific research. E.P.A. Each side of the debate has its points. Animal testing has its pros and cons but ultimately is unnecessary now. This research also included plenty of animal testing and therefore, animal experimentation may have played a major role to increase our overall life expectancy as a global society and may also continue to do so in the future. At this time, the primary use of in-vitro tests is the detection of specific toxic . The E.P.A. Another benefit of animal testing is that it can be quite useful to treat pandemics in the future. I definitely think we should be investing more in this research, she said, referring to alternative testing. Animals like mice tend to live two-three years. Check out a list of our latest victories. A reason for this, other than genetic makeup, is that the animals are kept in an unnatural environment (the laboratory) that places them under stress, which may alter their response. Continue with Recommended Cookies, The only animals that we test on are the two of us and our kids.. Did you know that pacemakers and anesthetics were developed using animal testing? We are a student group acting independently of the University of California. With the advent of modern molecular biology and its analytical methods, scientists can now quantify the precise extent to which humans resemble other animals, genetically speaking. Some argue that the benefits to humans justify animal testing. No experiment, no matter how painful or trivial, is prohibitedand painkillers are often not required. And they are killed at the end of the experiments to study the treatments effects. In turn, this may protect the lives of millions or even billions of animals. U.S. law allows for animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. Some drugs and products are harmful to animals but beneficial to humans. 1350 Words6 Pages. As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Its wrong and should be banned. Related Discussions . But scientists argue animal testing has been a crucial component in many medical breakthroughs, and as long as it's done ethically, animal testing should not be outlawed. to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way. In the end, taking the pros and cons into consideration, animal testing highlights the fine line between ethics and practical need, and the ultimate decision is subjective to the values of each individual. Best Budget Supplement for Joint Pain . On the one hand, we have scientists who support experiments on animals to advance science. Animal testing requires plenty of workforce and expensive equipment, leading to spending billions of dollars each year in this field. Yet around the world, millions of animals continue to be used in experiments and then killed. The provision would have banned research facilities from using any dog or cat that was . Since those reasons apply to many animals experimented upon, animal testing is also wrong. One of the significant negatives of animal testing is just how expensive it is. Therefore, animal research can also take away the need to test vaccines on humans in early research stages and can protect us humans from serious potential complications. Moreover, some viruses also mutate over time and may change their characteristics. 2023 Leaf Group Ltd. / Leaf Group Media, All Rights Reserved. It is also a common practice for animals' eyes to be held open with clips for hours, even days, in the course of testing cosmetics products. These tests should reduce the number of animal tests required for screening new drugs. PETAs vivid demonstrations and undercover investigations alert the public to wasteful, cruel, and useless experiments on animals, often ones occurring right under their noses. Simply because those children would be harmed and treated as mere things to be used (and abused) for my and my childs benefit, which they are not. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'environmental_conscience_com-narrow-sky-1','ezslot_16',197,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-narrow-sky-1-0'); For instance, animals are often treated quite poorly and suffer from quite poor living conditions. Animal testing should be banned because it is an unethical process that subjects animals to so much pain. Testing on animals is complicated, common, and actually more problematic than you may believe. Even in our current state of the world, there are so many bacteria and viruses around and we know quite little about the majority of them yet. Animal testing should be banned is all U.S laboratories due to cruel and painful procedures, unreliable results, and replaced with alternatives. It is one of the best simulate of human's physiology. Especially from an ethical perspective, animal research may not be justifiable and we as humanity should search for additional research methods in order to make animal testing obsolete in the future. Related article: Animal Testing In Makeup and Cosmetics. This is especially true for people who live in the poor part of our planet since they often do not have access to proper medical treatment or simply cannot afford it. For the longest time, no adequate alternative could match the complex systems found within humans and animals. In addition to the many reasons listed above, testing on animals is wasteful, violent, unproductive, and speciesist. Animals are sentient living creatures and their lives should be protected in the same way that human lives are. Theres a heated debate in the world of science. Human genes cloned into microorganisms can yield more specific toxicology results, for example, than simply administering toxins to animals. While it may make sense to use animal experiments from time to time since there are simply no other alternatives, those experiments may not be justifiable on a large scale. But suppose someone wanted to rob a bank and needed a getaway car: there is no alternative to a car and so it is necessary for the robbery. Among others, articles have been cited by NPOs, Wikipedia, Medium.com as well as on several college websites and lifestyle blogs. One important advantage of animal testing is that we will be better able to understand certain viruses and bacteria once we test their effects on animals. Research done on animals can save countless human lives. Photo by Louis Reed on Unsplash. Sather Health is a student health website that aims to deliver trusted health information to students and their communities. Many people cant deal with the fact that animals are intentionally poisoned or even have to die solely for the small chance of finding some medical treatments for us humans. A list of animal testing pros is incomplete without mentioning the main reason animal testing exists. Dr. Sass said animals were still necessary to study chronic conditions, like cancer and infertility. You Shouldnt Play With FireAdopt and Play With Fuego Instead! It has provided in saving the lives of people. Hence, we also have to sacrifice millions of animals each year for animal testing purposes and this can be also considered to be questionable from an ethical perspective. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_testing, https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/why-we-do-it/what-animal-testing, https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/animals-used-experimentation-factsheets/animal-experiments-overview/. Hi, I hope you enjoyed reading this article. As you can see, animal testing pros and cons are heavily debatable depending on the side youre on. E-Readers Increasing Reading Comprehension, Deterring Dyslexia, The (Non)Mystery Behind Female Ejaculation, Late-Night Work: How to Maximize Utility Without Sacrificing Health, Harm Reduction: Reducing Alcohol Consumption in the Dorms. The testing results have also provided benefits for animals as well. The previous analysis has shown that are several advantages related to animal testing. And more than 95% of new drugs that test safe and effective in animals go on to fail in human clinical trials. Computer modeling, robotics, 3-D modeling, in-vitro testing, and even human volunteers are all acceptable replacements. Sometimes the animals are deprived of food and water. Text STOP to end, HELP for more info. Theres been a lot of positive action among other federal agencies, but we want to see all government agencies take this step.. Do you support the decision? Animal testing doesnt just benefit human beings. Therefore, we may want to focus on extensive research in the medical field in order to be able to find suitable medicine to cure future diseases. So how about we dive deep into animal testing pros and cons and see which side of the debate we want to be on. Recently we were able to see an impressive lecture from Manchester University about the pros and cons of animal testing and also animal rights. You can rest assured knowing that the delicious vegan foods youll find recommended in our Living section come from such companies. Wanna make a contribution to save our environment? There are already sufficient safety data and many non-animal methods available to make animal testing obsolete for these products. Many would and thats an understandable feeling. PETA Leads the Charge: Inside the Global Effort to Take Down Exotic Skins, The Perilous Ripple Effects That Lead Ammo Has on Animals, Humans, and the Planet. Although testing on animals are the best alternative to actual humans, there is still an important margin of error, and some people still believe animal testing to be unreliable. Our goal is to make science relevant and fun for everyone. This is why such animals get affected by the same diseases and health conditions as us. Still, one cant deny what the world has gained from animal testing. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_7',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0');if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_8',189,'0','1'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0_1');.large-mobile-banner-2-multi-189{border:none!important;display:block!important;float:none!important;line-height:0;margin-bottom:7px!important;margin-left:auto!important;margin-right:auto!important;margin-top:7px!important;max-width:100%!important;min-height:250px;padding:0;text-align:center!important}This vast increase in life expectancy is due to increased wealth levels, but also mainly due to our rapid medical progress and due to the extensive research that has been done over the past decades. It helps in generating new treatments and benefits for the society. Animal testing is cruel. They don't have a voice . For example, research on dogs in which the animals' pancreases were removed led to the discovery of insulin in the early 20th century; this has saved and improved the lives of millions of diabetics worldwide. When you think about the financial burden countries have to bear, it becomes questionable whether animal testing really provides enough benefits. Chimpanzees and humans share 99 percent of their DNA, and even mice and humans have a 98 percent overlap in this area. And according to cell biologist Robin Lovell-Badge of the MRC National Institute for Medical Research in London, 94 percent of drugs that passed tests in animals failed in people. Related article: Should testing on animals be banned? Most research projects are unregulated by the government. Many research findings related to animal testing are often also quite ambiguous. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-leader-3','ezslot_11',193,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-leader-3-0'); This may give us an edge and we may find suitable treatment faster. Why? Check out the page below, which makes it quick and easy to urge experimenters to end tests on animals: Take Action: Lets End All Animal Testing. Studies published in prestigious medical journals have repeatedly shown that experiments on animals waste animals lives and precious resources because they arent even relevant to human health. You might wonder how an animal who doesn't speak can consent to research. Says It Will Drastically Reduce Animal Testing, Mihir Zaveri, Mariel Padilla and Jaclyn Peiser write about the decision: The E.P.A. You can join PETA in opposing these cruel and useless tests by taking action today: Help End Experiments on Animals at Colleges. Animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to human beings in many ways. Thanks to animal research, we have had significant advances in treatment for conditions such as cystic fibrosis, polio, multiple sclerosis, breast cancer, childhood leukemia, and more. Do you think it is ever justified? What are your thoughts on animal testing? 92% of drugs dont make it past animal testing trials. Opponents of animal research often claim that the rights of animals should have a higher priority than potential research findings that could help humanity to cure certain diseases and therefore, animal testing should be completely abandoned. to move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals? Legal. Sometimes, theyre subjected to painful procedures that inflict them with burns, wounds, and pain to test. We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. But when one group benefits at the major expense of another group, thats usually wrong. Proponents of animal testing say that it. The PETA International Science Consortium Ltd. works with agencies around the world to reduce the number of animals used in tests. One of the main advantages for animal testing is advancements in medical research 2. Msg/data rates may apply. Really, the question is: why should animal testing be banned? The E.P.A.s deadline is arbitrary, Dr. Sass said. 5. Founded and managed by UC Berkeley students, we are an ASUC-sponsored student organization and a student-run DeCal course. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. The E.P.A. Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox! These reasons show that animal testing should be banned, it harms animals, there are better options, and animals and humans are very different. 886 Words; 4 Pages; Good Essays. My name is Andreas and my mission is to educate people of all ages about our environmental problems and how everyone can make a contribution to mitigate these issues. In addition to similar DNA, humans and some animals have the same organs, bloodstream, and central nervous system. PETAs searchable Global Beauty Without Bunnies list makes it easy to find cruelty-free companies that have committed to never testing their cosmetics or household cleaning products on animalshere or abroad. In fact, in the majority of cases, the findings from animal testing will be rather useless for the application of drugs for humans. However, chances are that standardized processes will lead to a state where animal testing will be the main way to go and that it will be used in an excessive manner that may not be justifiable from an ethical perspective in the long run. Animal testing is one of those concepts that raise a diverse set of opinions. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. The polio vaccine developed for human use only after it was tested on animals has helped reduce this dreaded disease to near-irrelevance. Mink fur typically comes from animals who are forced to live in deplorable conditions & die in agony. Yes, animals suffer and are even killed in the pursuit of knowledge. Animal testing refers to the practice of performing unnatural and often painful experiments on animals held captive in stressful laboratory settings, often in the misguided belief that the results of the tests will be applicable to humans. 9279. It has even brought certain species from the brink of extinction. And no, not a discussion about theories or hypotheses but about ethics. The state of the world will always be changing and in order to adapt to those changes, it is crucial that also our research continues to improve over time. Therefore, also from a religious perspective, animal research can be considered to be quite problematic and may even be illegal in regions where those religions are quite popular. Quite often, before those vaccines will be approved for medical applications on the general public, plenty of trials have to be carried out in order to assure the safety of those vaccines. Animal testing is one of the most controversial aspects of modern-day science. They even engage in acts of self-mutilation, including tearing out their own hair and biting their own flesh. Explains that animal testing involves testing pharmaceutical drugs on animals in order to see the effectiveness and side effects of the drug. Numerous laws inhibit testing on human beings, especially when the experiments involve genetic manipulation. Sir Alexander Fleming, who discovered penicillin nearly 100 years ago, remarked, "How fortunate we didn't have these animal tests in the 1940s, for penicillin . It's unethical. You may argue that computer models have made tremendous advancements. Why or why not? Whether you need help solving quadratic equations, inspiration for the upcoming science fair or the latest update on a major storm, Sciencing is here to help. Our interest isnt in speed, its getting it right. Understatement: this is often unpleasant. Another downside of animal testing is that many people consider it to be a rather cruel practice. After finishing university, I traveled around the world. According to the Humane Society International, animals are routinely force-fed, forced to inhale noxious compounds, deprived of food and water, physically restrained for prolonged periods, and burned; some of them reportedly even have their necks broken and are decapitated. The animals themselves gain from it. PETA scientists sat in as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency made the historic announcement that it would end toxicity tests on mammalssomething weve pushed the agency to do for nearly 20 years. Animals used for such safety testing are usually not killed and remain relatively healthy. Hence, in order to protect our general public from unknown harmful effects from those products, animal testing may give some indication regarding potential dangers of those products. This popularity is bound to grow as time goes on.
Where Is Qr Code On Lg Refrigerator,
Articles A
